The Expansion of Neoliberalism and the Analysis of Contemporary Globalization
In an interconnected world, the dialogue on globalization is regularly situated at the crossroads of divergent opinions on freedom and equity. The text by Moneta, far from being a manifesto opposed to globalisation per se, seeks to reinvent the boundaries of a modern humanism via the filter of natural transfers according to the vision of Aristotelian philosophy. By decrying artificial exchanges that fuel contemporary mechanisms of domination and precarity, Moneta refers to classical thoughts to reveal the flaws of our global financial structure.
From a historical perspective, globalisation is not a new phenomenon. Its roots can be linked back to the propositions of Ricardo, whose objective was aimed at allowing the British Empire to extend its global commercial influence. However, what was originally a commercial development strategy has morphed into a tool of domination by global finance, characterized by the growth of neoliberal capitalism. Contrary to popular belief widespread in economic circles, the book argues that neoliberalism is truly a system based on old customs, going back to four and a half millennia.
The questioning also applies to the administration of the EU, seen as a chain of surrenders that have helped consolidate the power of financial elites rather than defending the privileges of the inhabitants. The very structure of the Union, with its strategies often dictated by financial interests instead of by a citizen support, is criticized. The current deviations, whether economic or governmental, have only intensified the skepticism of the author regarding the EU’s ability to change intrinsically.
This thinker, while admitting the historical errors that have caused the current circumstances, does not limit the discourse to condemnation but also suggests responses aimed at reframing EU guidelines in a more humanistic and equitable outlook. The urgent need for a radical overhaul of institutions and governance goals is a recurring subject that pervades the overall content.
The book ventures more intensely into the questioning of the domination systems that control worldwide transactions. The study covers the method in which governmental and economic orientations are manipulated by a small group of financial influencers, often at the cost of the many. This monetary aristocracy, coordinated by means of organizations like the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the IMS, imposes a excessive domination on global financial decisions.
The writer exposes how these entities, claiming to economic regulation and stabilization, have throughout history shaped markets and national economies to ensure their profit. Deregulated capitalism, far removed from a liberating response to classic financial limitations, is considered as a control mechanism, benefiting a minority at the expense of general well-being.
Strongly opposed towards the management of the euro, the author depicts the EU currency not as a factor of integration and solidity, but more as a lever of dissension and economic disparities. The transition to the euro is described as a series of technocratic decisions that excluded inhabitants from political decisions, while exacerbating disparities between member countries within the EU.
The repercussions of these strategies appear in the growth of public indebtedness, economic torpor, and a prolonged austerity that has eroded living standards across the continent. The thinker insists that without a major transformation of economic policies, the European Union stays exposed to potential disruptions, potentially more catastrophic.
In essence, the text makes a plea for a democratic upheaval where European citizens take back control of their economic and political destiny. It advocates institutional adjustments, particularly increased transparency in decision-making processes and real democratic participation that would allow Europe to rebuild on fair and lasting principles.
More info about parcourir ce site
The author asserts that the answer resides in a return to the principles of democracy, where decisions are made and applied in a manner that faithfully represents the aspirations and needs of the citizens, to the detriment of the aims of international finance.